Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Bypass SID0 for NXP i.MX95

[Pranjal Shrivastava]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 04:13:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2024-10-15 1:47 pm, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:13:28AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > 
> > > Umm.. this was specific for rmr not a generic thing. I'd suggest to
> > > avoid meddling with the STEs directly for acheiving bypass. Playing
> > > with the iommu domain type could be neater. Perhaps, modify the
> > > ops->def_domain_type to return an appropriate domain?
> > 
> > Yeah, that is the expected way, to force the def_domain_type to
> > IDENTITY and refuse to attach a PAGING/BLOCKED domain.
> 
> There is no domain, this is bypassing an arbitrary StreamID not associated
> with any device. Which incidentally is something an IORT RMR can quite
> happily achieve already (I think the DT reserved-memory binding does need a
> proper device node to relate to, though).

+1. I assumed that the use-case was to first attach the streamID to a
device and then intall a bypass for that specific streamID. If that's
not the case, I'm not sure why are we trying to achieve that.

I thought about rmr too, but it looks like the "device" is a DMA and may
want to write to more than a fixed region of memory.

> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.

Thanks,
Pranjal