Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Fix color format MACROs in OVL

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:30 AM Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In commit 9f428b95ac89 ("drm/mediatek: Add new color format MACROs in
> OVL"), some new color formats are defined in the MACROs to make the
> switch statement more concise. However, there are typos in these
> formats MACROs, which cause the return value to be incorrect. Fix the
> typos to ensure the return value remains unchanged.

Right. I had a little bit of time figuring it out from the commit
message of the original CL, but I think the commit you're fixing was
_intended_ to be a noop and just a cleanup. ...but after resolving the
#defines before and after I can see that it wasn't.


> Fix: 9f428b95ac89 ("drm/mediatek: Add new color format MACROs in OVL")

The above syntax isn't quite right. It should be:

Fixes: 9f428b95ac89 ("drm/mediatek: Add new color format MACROs in OVL")

See `Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst` which talks about
how to get `git` to format it for you.


> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> index 89b439dcf3a6af9f5799487fdc0f128a9b5cbe4a..1632ac5c23d87e1cdc41013a9cf7864728dcb63b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
>  #define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_RGB     (1 << 12)
>  #define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_ARGB8888        (2 << 12)
>  #define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_RGBA8888        (3 << 12)
> -#define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_ABGR8888        (OVL_CON_CLRFMT_RGBA8888 | OVL_CON_BYTE_SWAP)
> -#define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_BGRA8888        (OVL_CON_CLRFMT_ARGB8888 | OVL_CON_BYTE_SWAP)
> +#define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_ABGR8888        (OVL_CON_CLRFMT_ARGB8888 | OVL_CON_BYTE_SWAP)
> +#define OVL_CON_CLRFMT_BGRA8888        (OVL_CON_CLRFMT_RGBA8888 | OVL_CON_BYTE_SWAP)

Other than the slightly broken "Fixes" tag, the above looks right to me.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>