Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: Implement Hyper-V's vCPU suspended state

[Nicolas Saenz Julienne]

Hi Sean,

On Tue Oct 15, 2024 at 3:58 PM UTC, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Before we spend too much time cleaning things up, I want to first settle on the
> overall design, because it's not clear to me that punting HvTranslateVirtualAddress
> to userspace is a net positive.  We agreed that VTLs should be modeled primarily
> in userspace, but that doesn't automatically make punting everything to userspace
> the best option, especially given the discussion at KVM Forum with respect to
> mplementing VTLs, VMPLs, TD partitions, etc.

Since you mention it, Paolo said he was going to prep a doc with an
overview of the design we discussed there. Was it published? Did I miss
it?

Thanks,
Nicolas