Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] TDX host: metadata reading tweaks, bug fix and info dump

[Dan Williams]

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 5:30 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'm having one of those "I hate this all" moments.  Look at what we say
> > in the code:
> >
> > >   * See the "global_metadata.json" in the "TDX 1.5 ABI definitions".
> >
> > Basically step one in verifying that this is all right is: Hey, humans,
> > please go parse a machine-readable format.  That's insanity.  If Intel
> > wants to publish JSON as the canonical source of truth, that's fine.
> > It's great, actually.  But let's stop playing human JSON parser and make
> > the computers do it for us, OK?
> >
> > Let's just generate the code.  Basically, as long as the generated C is
> > marginally readable, I'm OK with it.  The most important things are:
> >
> >  1. Adding a field is dirt simple
> >  2. Using the generated C is simple
> >
> > In 99% of the cases, nobody ends up having to ever look at the generated
> > code.
> >
> > Take a look at the attached python program and generated C file.  I
> > think they qualify.  We can check the script into tools/scripts/ and it
> > can get re-run when new json comes out or when a new field is needed.
> > You'd could call the generated code like this:
> 
> Ok, so let's move this thing forward. Here is a more polished script
> and the output. Untested beyond compilation.
> 
> Kai, feel free to include it in v6 with my
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I made an attempt at adding array support and using it with the CMR
> information; just to see if Intel is actually trying to make
> global_metadata.json accurate. The original code has
> 
>   for (i = 0; i < sysinfo_cmr->num_cmrs; i++) {
>     READ_SYS_INFO(CMR_BASE + i, cmr_base[i]);
>     READ_SYS_INFO(CMR_SIZE + i, cmr_size[i]);
>   }
> 
> The generated code instead always tries to read 32 fields and returns
> non-zero from get_tdx_sys_info_cmr if they are missing. If it fails to
> read the fields above NUM_CMRS, just remove that part of the tdx.py
> script and make sure that a comment in the code shames the TDX ABI
> documentation adequately. :)

Thanks for doing this Paolo, I regret not pushing harder [1] / polishing
up the bash+jq script I threw together to do the same.

I took a look at your script and the autogenerated code and it looks good
to me.

Feel free to add my Reviewed-by on a patch that adds that collateral to
the tools/ directory.

[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/66b19beaadd28_4fc729410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.notmuch