RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module

From: Wei Fang
Date: Tue Oct 15 2024 - 21:48:13 EST

Next message: Liam R. Howlett: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] maple_tree: add mas_for_each_rev() helper"
Previous message: Huang Ying: "[PATCH -v2] resource: Remove dependency on SPARSEMEM from GET_FREE_REGION"
In reply to: Frank Li: "Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module"
Next in thread: Wei Fang: "[PATCH v2 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: move some common interfaces to enetc_pf_common.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2024年10月16日 0:35
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>; Claudiu
> Manoil <claudiu.manoil@xxxxxxx>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>;
> christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx;
> horms@xxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c
> as a separate module
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:58:34PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > enetc_pf_common.c provides the common interfaces for the PF drivers of
> > ENETC v1 and v4. So it's better to make enetc_pf_common.c as a separate
> > module in order to prepare to add support for ENETC v4 PF driver in
> > subsequent patches.
> >
> > Because the ENETC of the two versions is different, so some hardware
> > operations involved in these common interfaces will also be different,
> > Therefore, struct enetc_pf_ops is added to register different hardware
> > operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers.
> >
>
> Is it little better
>
> Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
> between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
> different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
> drivers.
>

Great, thanks.

> look like this patch only add v1 ops?
>
Yes, the enetc v4 support is added later.

> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2 changes:
> > This patch is separated from v1 patch 5 ("net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common
> > driver support"), only the changes to compile enetc_pf_common.c into a
> > separated driver are kept.
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 9 ++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 5 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 26 ++++++++--
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 21 ++++++--
> > .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 50
> ++++++++++++++++---
> > 5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> > index 51d80ea959d4..fdd3ecbd1dbf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ config FSL_ENETC_CORE
> >
> > If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc-core.
> >
> > +config NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> > + tristate "ENETC PF common functionality driver"
> > + help
> > + This module supports common functionality between drivers of
> > + different versions of NXP ENETC PF controllers.
> > +
> > + If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc-pf-common.
> > +
> > config FSL_ENETC
> > tristate "ENETC PF driver"
> > depends on PCI_MSI
> > @@ -14,6 +22,7 @@ config FSL_ENETC
> > select FSL_ENETC_CORE
> > select FSL_ENETC_IERB
> > select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
> > + select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> > select PHYLINK
> > select PCS_LYNX
> > select DIMLIB
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > index 39675e9ff39d..b81ca462e358 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > @@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_CORE) += fsl-enetc-core.o
> > fsl-enetc-core-y := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
> >
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON) += nxp-enetc-pf-common.o
> > +nxp-enetc-pf-common-y := enetc_pf_common.o
> > +
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
> > -fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o enetc_pf_common.o
> > +fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
> > fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> > fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> > index 3cdd149056f9..7522316ddfea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> >
> > #define ENETC_DRV_NAME_STR "ENETC PF driver"
> >
> > -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> > +static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8
> *addr)
>
> Previous patch you remove static, this patch you add back. Is it neccessary
> at prevous patch to remove static?

enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr() was used by enetc_setup_mac_address(),
and enetc_setup_mac_address() was moved to enetc_pf_common.c. So I removed
the static descriptor of enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(). Otherwise I need to
move it to enect_pf_common.c at the previous patch. But enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr()
is not a common interface used by v1 and v4 drivers, because the registers are
different, so I add enetc_ps_ops::get_si_primary_mac() and add 'static' back at
the current patch.

>
> -static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8
> *addr)
> +void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
>
> > {
> > u32 upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR0(si));
> > u16 lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
> > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw
> *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> > put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
> > }
> >
> > -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > - const u8 *addr)
> > +static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > + const u8 *addr)
> > {
> > u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
> > u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
> > @@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct
> enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
> > }
> >
> > +static struct phylink_pcs *enetc_pf_create_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> > + struct mii_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + return lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void enetc_pf_destroy_pcs(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> > +{
> > + lynx_pcs_destroy(pcs);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void enetc_set_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, char si_map)
> > {
> > u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC_PSIPVMR);
> > @@ -970,6 +981,14 @@ static void enetc_psi_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc_pf_ops = {
> > + .set_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr,
> > + .get_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr,
> > + .create_pcs = enetc_pf_create_pcs,
> > + .destroy_pcs = enetc_pf_destroy_pcs,
> > + .enable_psfp = enetc_psfp_enable,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > {
> > @@ -997,6 +1016,7 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
> > pf->si = si;
> > pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
> > + enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc_pf_ops);
> >
> > err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(node, pf);
> > if (err)
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > index 92a26b09cf57..39db9d5c2e50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
> > enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
> > };
> >
> > +struct enetc_pf;
> > +
> > +struct enetc_pf_ops {
> > + void (*set_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, const u8 *addr);
> > + void (*get_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
> > + struct phylink_pcs *(*create_pcs)(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct mii_bus
> *bus);
> > + void (*destroy_pcs)(struct phylink_pcs *pcs);
> > + int (*enable_psfp)(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> > +};
> > +
> > struct enetc_pf {
> > struct enetc_si *si;
> > int num_vfs; /* number of active VFs, after sriov_init */
> > @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ struct enetc_pf {
> >
> > phy_interface_t if_mode;
> > struct phylink_config phylink_config;
> > +
> > + const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
> > };
> >
> > #define phylink_to_enetc_pf(config) \
> > @@ -59,9 +71,6 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16
> *status);
> >
> > -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8
> *addr);
> > -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > - const u8 *addr);
> > int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
> > int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf
> *pf);
> > void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> > @@ -71,3 +80,9 @@ void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node
> *node,
> > const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
> > void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> > +
> > +static inline void enetc_pf_ops_register(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> > + const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + pf->ops = ops;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> > index be6aec19b1f3..2c6ce887f583 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> > @@ -7,19 +7,37 @@
> >
> > #include "enetc_pf.h"
> >
> > +static int enetc_set_si_hw_addr(struct enetc_pf *pf, int si, u8 *mac_addr)
> > +{
> > + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> > +
> > + if (pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac)
> > + pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
> > + else
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
> > {
> > struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
> > struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
> > + int err;
> >
> > if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
> > return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> >
> > + err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, 0, saddr->sa_data);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
> > - enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_set_mac_addr);
> >
> > static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct
> enetc_pf *pf,
> > int si)
> > @@ -37,8 +55,8 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct
> device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
> > }
> >
> > /* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
> > - if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
> > - enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> > + if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr) && pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac)
> > + pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
> >
> > /* (3) choose a random one */
> > if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
> > @@ -47,7 +65,9 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct
> device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
> > si, mac_addr);
> > }
> >
> > - enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> > + err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, si, mac_addr);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -69,11 +89,13 @@ int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node
> *np, struct enetc_pf *pf)
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_setup_mac_addresses);
> >
> > void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> > const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
> > {
> > struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
> >
> > SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
> > priv->ndev = ndev;
> > @@ -106,7 +128,8 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si,
> struct net_device *ndev,
> > NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT |
> NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
> > NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
> >
> > - if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
> > + if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && pf->ops->enable_psfp &&
> > + !pf->ops->enable_psfp(priv)) {
> > priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
> > ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> > ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> > @@ -115,6 +138,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si,
> struct net_device *ndev,
> > /* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
> > enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_netdev_setup);
> >
> > static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
> > {
> > @@ -161,6 +185,9 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> > struct mii_bus *bus;
> > int err;
> >
> > + if (!pf->ops->create_pcs)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
> > if (!bus)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -183,7 +210,7 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> > goto free_mdio_bus;
> > }
> >
> > - phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> > + phylink_pcs = pf->ops->create_pcs(pf, bus);
> > if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
> > dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
> > @@ -204,8 +231,8 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> >
> > static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> > {
> > - if (pf->pcs)
> > - lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
> > + if (pf->pcs && pf->ops->destroy_pcs)
> > + pf->ops->destroy_pcs(pf->pcs);
> >
> > if (pf->imdio) {
> > mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
> > @@ -245,12 +272,14 @@ int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> struct device_node *node)
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_create);
> >
> > void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> > {
> > enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
> > enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_destroy);
> >
> > int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node
> *node,
> > const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops)
> > @@ -287,8 +316,13 @@ int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv
> *priv, struct device_node *node,
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_create);
> >
> > void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > {
> > phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_destroy);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NXP ENETC PF common functionality driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

Next message: Liam R. Howlett: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] maple_tree: add mas_for_each_rev() helper"
Previous message: Huang Ying: "[PATCH -v2] resource: Remove dependency on SPARSEMEM from GET_FREE_REGION"
In reply to: Frank Li: "Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module"
Next in thread: Wei Fang: "[PATCH v2 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: move some common interfaces to enetc_pf_common.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]