Re: [v3 2/2] irqchip/aspeed-intc: Add support for AST27XX INTC
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Wed Oct 16 2024 - 05:55:29 EST
> Making a guard variant of chained_irq_enter/exit needs some thought and
> a general plan for cleaning the whole chained irq usage up. It's on the
> cleanup list already with quite some other items.
I became also curious how API usage will evolve further here.
> We are not adhoc adding a guard variant because guards are hip right now.
Application interests are growing, aren't they?
> And no this does not need a scoped variant ever.
There are subsystems which seem to prefer such a programming interface occasionally.
> guards are not the panacea for everything.
Their usage might become more popular.
Regards,
Markus