RE: [PATCH v13 01/18] EDAC: Add support for EDAC device features control

[Shiju Jose]

Hi Jonathan, 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: 14 October 2024 15:18
>To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>bp@xxxxxxxxx; tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx;
>mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
>dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx; alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx; vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx;
>ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx; david@xxxxxxxxxx; Vilas.Sridharan@xxxxxxx;
>leo.duran@xxxxxxx; Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx; rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx;
>jiaqiyan@xxxxxxxxxx; Jon.Grimm@xxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx; james.morse@xxxxxxx; jthoughton@xxxxxxxxxx;
>somasundaram.a@xxxxxxx; erdemaktas@xxxxxxxxxx; pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx;
>duenwen@xxxxxxxxxx; gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx;
>wschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dferguson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>wbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nifan.cxl@xxxxxxxxx; tanxiaofei
><tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Roberto
>Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>; kangkang.shen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linuxarm
><linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/18] EDAC: Add support for EDAC device features
>control
>
>On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:41:02 +0100
><shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add generic EDAC device features control supports registering RAS
>> features supported in the system. Driver exposes features control
>> attributes to userspace in
>> /sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/<ras-feature>/
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Hi Shiju,
>
>Spotted a few minor bugs in here that I'd missed in internal review :( See below.
>
>Jonathan

Thanks for reviewing.
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 105
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/edac.h       |  32 +++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
>> index 621dc2a5d034..0b8aa8150239 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
>
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * edac_dev_register - register device for RAS features with EDAC
>> + * @parent: client device.
>> + * @name: client device's name.
>> + * @private: parent driver's data to store in the context if any.
>> + * @num_features: number of RAS features to register.
>> + * @ras_features: list of RAS features to register.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + *  * %0       - Success.
>> + *  * %-EINVAL - Invalid parameters passed.
>> + *  * %-ENOMEM - Dynamic memory allocation failed.
>> + *
>> + * The new edac_dev_feat_ctx would be freed automatically.
>> + */
>> +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *name,
>> +		      void *private, int num_features,
>> +		      const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features) {
>
>...
>
>> +	ret = device_register(&ctx->dev);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		put_device(&ctx->dev);
>> +		goto groups_free;
>> +		return ret;
>
>Unreachable line. However, shouldn't have the goto here as put_device() should
>result in the release being called in which case this is a double free. So drop the
>goto and keep the return.
Fixed.
>
>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, edac_dev_unreg, &ctx->dev);
>> +
>> +groups_free:
>> +	kfree(ras_attr_groups);
>> +ctx_free:
>> +	kfree(ctx);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_dev_register);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h index
>> b4ee8961e623..1db008a82690 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/edac.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/edac.h
>> @@ -661,4 +661,36 @@ static inline struct dimm_info
>> *edac_get_dimm(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>
>
>> +/* EDAC device feature information structure */ struct edac_dev_data
>> +{
>> +	u8 instance;
>> +	void *private;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct device;
>
>That forwards def doesn't work as this header needs to include enough
>information to establish layout of struct edac_dev_feat_ctx.
>Header already includes linux/device.h so just drop this.
Deleted.
>
>
>> +
>> +struct edac_dev_feat_ctx {
>> +	struct device dev;
>> +	void *private;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct edac_dev_feature {
>> +	enum edac_dev_feat ft_type;
>> +	u8 instance;
>> +	void *ctx;
>> +};
>> +
>> +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *dev_name,
>> +		      void *parent_pvt_data, int num_features,
>> +		      const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features);
>>  #endif /* _LINUX_EDAC_H_ */


Thanks,
Shiju