Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: KVM: Add test case for MMIO during event delivery

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 17:21 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> 
> > +
> > +       /* We should never reach this point */
> 
> No pronouns.  Yes, it's nitpicky, but "we" gets _very_ ambiguous when "we" could
> mean the admin, the user, the VMM, KVM, the guest, etc.
> 
> > +       GUEST_ASSERT(0);


Is there really *any* way that can be interpreted as anything other
than "the CPU executing this code will never get to this point and
that's why there's an ASSERT(0) right after this comment"?

I don't believe there's *any* way that particular pronoun can be
ambiguous, and now we've got to the point of fetishising the bizarre
"no pronouns" rule just for the sake of it.

I get it, especially for some individuals it *can* be difficult to take
context into account, and the wilful use of pronouns instead of
spelling things out explicitly *every* *single* *time* can sometimes
help. But at a cost of conciseness and brevity.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature