Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into a switch() statement

From: Sohil Mehta
Date: Fri Oct 18 2024 - 20:05:02 EST

Next message: Kuan-Wei Chiu: "Re: Using union-find in BPF verifier (was: Enhance union-find with KUnit tests and optimization improvements)"
Previous message: Dominique Martinet: "Re: [PATCH] 9p: Avoid creating multiple slab caches with the same name"
In reply to: Tony Luck: "Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into a switch() statement"
Next in thread: Zhuo, Qiuxu: "RE: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into a switch() statement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/18/2024 1:14 PM, Tony Luck wrote:

> The vendor specific bits are large enough to warrant their own
> static functions (as we do elsewhere in this file).
>
> How about this (only compile-tested) patch?
>

Yeah, it does make it easier to read. Can some of the hardcoded numbers
be changed to vfm macros as well?

Next message: Kuan-Wei Chiu: "Re: Using union-find in BPF verifier (was: Enhance union-find with KUnit tests and optimization improvements)"
Previous message: Dominique Martinet: "Re: [PATCH] 9p: Avoid creating multiple slab caches with the same name"
In reply to: Tony Luck: "Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into a switch() statement"
Next in thread: Zhuo, Qiuxu: "RE: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into a switch() statement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]