Re: [PATCH v2 net 4/4] ixgbevf: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in ixgbevf_run_xdp()
From: Yue Haibing
Date: Fri Oct 18 2024 - 22:27:21 EST
On 2024/10/18 20:23, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:37:34AM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>> ixgbevf_run_xdp() converts customed xdp action to a negative error code
>> with the sk_buff pointer type which be checked with IS_ERR in
>> ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(). Remove this error pointer handing instead use
>> plain int return value.
>>
>> Fixes: c7aec59657b6 ("ixgbevf: Add XDP support for pass and drop actions")
>> Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 23 ++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>> index 149911e3002a..183d2305d058 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>> @@ -732,10 +732,6 @@ static bool ixgbevf_cleanup_headers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
>> union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc,
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> - /* XDP packets use error pointer so abort at this point */
>> - if (IS_ERR(skb))
>> - return true;
>> -
>> /* verify that the packet does not have any known errors */
>> if (unlikely(ixgbevf_test_staterr(rx_desc,
>> IXGBE_RXDADV_ERR_FRAME_ERR_MASK))) {
>> @@ -1044,9 +1040,9 @@ static int ixgbevf_xmit_xdp_ring(struct ixgbevf_ring *ring,
>> return IXGBEVF_XDP_TX;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct sk_buff *ixgbevf_run_xdp(struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter,
>> - struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
>> - struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>> +static int ixgbevf_run_xdp(struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter,
>> + struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
>> + struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>
> ditto
yuehaibing@localhost:~/code/net$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0004-ixgbevf-Fix-passing-0-to-ERR_PTR-in-ixgbevf_run_xdp.patch
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 67 lines checked
0004-ixgbevf-Fix-passing-0-to-ERR_PTR-in-ixgbevf_run_xdp.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
>> {
>> int result = IXGBEVF_XDP_PASS;
>> struct ixgbevf_ring *xdp_ring;
>> @@ -1080,7 +1076,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbevf_run_xdp(struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter,
>> break;
>> }
>> xdp_out:
>> - return ERR_PTR(-result);
>> + return result;
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned int ixgbevf_rx_frame_truesize(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
>> @@ -1122,6 +1118,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
>> struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
>> bool xdp_xmit = false;
>> struct xdp_buff xdp;
>> + int xdp_res;
>>
>> /* Frame size depend on rx_ring setup when PAGE_SIZE=4K */
>> #if (PAGE_SIZE < 8192)
>> @@ -1165,11 +1162,11 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
>> /* At larger PAGE_SIZE, frame_sz depend on len size */
>> xdp.frame_sz = ixgbevf_rx_frame_truesize(rx_ring, size);
>> #endif
>> - skb = ixgbevf_run_xdp(adapter, rx_ring, &xdp);
>> + xdp_res = ixgbevf_run_xdp(adapter, rx_ring, &xdp);
>> }
>>
>> - if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(skb) == -IXGBEVF_XDP_TX) {
>> + if (xdp_res) {
>> + if (xdp_res == IXGBEVF_XDP_TX) {
>> xdp_xmit = true;
>> ixgbevf_rx_buffer_flip(rx_ring, rx_buffer,
>> size);
>> @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
>> }
>>
>> /* exit if we failed to retrieve a buffer */
>> - if (!skb) {
>> + if (!xdp_res && !skb) {
>> rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
>> rx_buffer->pagecnt_bias++;
>> break;
>> @@ -1203,7 +1200,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
>> continue;
>>
>> /* verify the packet layout is correct */
>> - if (ixgbevf_cleanup_headers(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb)) {
>> + if (xdp_res || ixgbevf_cleanup_headers(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb)) {
>> skb = NULL;
>> continue;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
> .