Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

[Helge Deller]

On 10/21/24 21:22, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:23:21AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:20:38AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in
> > > > > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know!
> > > > >
> > > > > I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0]
> > > >
> > > > I've moved it to modules-next as I've found no issues.
> > > >
> > > >    Luis
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe this patch series is wrong.
> > >
> > > I thought we agreed that the alignment must be added to
> > > individual asm code, not to the linker script.
> > >
> > > I am surprised that you came back to this.
> >
> > I misseed the dialog on the old cover letter, sorry. I've yanked these patches
> > out. I'd expect a respin from Helge.
>
> Just goind down memory lane -- Helge, the work here pending was to move
> this to the linker script. Were you going to follow up on this?

Masahiro mentions above, that the alignment should be added
to the individual asm code. This happened in the meantime for parisc, but
I'm not sure if all platforms get this right.
So in addition, I still believe that adding the alignment to the linker
script too is another right thing to do.

Helge