Re: [PATCH v3] ata: libata: Clear DID_TIME_OUT for ATA PT commands with sense data

[Niklas Cassel]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:44:08PM +0800, Lai, Yi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 05:20:12PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > Hello Yi Lai,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 06:58:59PM +0800, Lai, Yi wrote:
> > > > Hi Niklas Cassel,
> > > > 
> > > > Greetings!
> > > > 
> > > > I used Syzkaller and found that there is INFO: task hung in blk_mq_get_tag in v6.12-rc3
> > > > 
> > > > After bisection and the first bad commit is:
> > > > "
> > > > e5dd410acb34 ata: libata: Clear DID_TIME_OUT for ATA PT commands with sense data
> > > > "
> > > 
> > > It might be that your bisection results are accurate.
> > > 
> > > However, after looking at the stacktraces, I find it way more likely that
> > > bisection has landed on the wrong commit.
> > > 
> > > See this series that was just queued (for 6.13) a few days ago that solves a
> > > similar starvation:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20241014092934.53630-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.13/block
> > > 
> > > You could perhaps run with v6.14-rc4 (which should be able to trigger the bug)
> > > and then try v6.14-rc4 + that series applied, to see if you can still trigger
> > > the bug?
> > 
> > Another patch that might be relevant:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e972b08b91ef48488bae9789f03cfedb148667fb
> > 
> > Which fixes a use after delete in rq_qos_wake_function().
> > (We can see that the stack trace has rq_qos_wake_function() before
> > getting stuck forever in rq_qos_wait())
> > 
> > Who knows what could go wrong when accessing a deleted entry, in the
> > report there was a crash, but I could image other surprises :)
> > The fix was first included in v6.12-rc4.
> > 
> >
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> Thanks for the info. I have tried using v6.12-rc4 kernel to reproduce
> the issue. Using the same repro binary, the issue still exists.

Thanks a lot for your help with testing!

The first series that I pointed to, which looks most likely to be related:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20241014092934.53630-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Is only merged in:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.13/block

It is not included in v6.12-rc4.

Would it please be possible for you to test with Jens's for-6.13/block branch?


Kind regards,
Niklas