Re: [syzbot] [udf?] general protection fault in udf_read_folio

[Jan Kara]

On Tue 22-10-24 02:19:19, Gianfranco Trad wrote:
> On 22/10/24 02:04, syzbot wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:
> > 
> > Reported-by: syzbot+ddf8715339c89280b6fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Tested-by: syzbot+ddf8715339c89280b6fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Tested on:
> > 
> > commit:         c2ee9f59 KVM: selftests: Fix build on on non-x86 archi..
> > git tree:       upstream
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12684640580000
> > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=fc6f8ce8c5369043
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ddf8715339c89280b6fc
> > compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> > 
> > Note: no patches were applied.
> > Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in udf_read_folio a month ago [1].
> 
> This bug was marked as still open on syzbot, so I retested the reproducer
> (no patch applied) to check if the bug was still valid upstream, seems not
> (as reported up).
> Wondering if syzbot will now try to find another reproducer, since after
> this check the reproducer was crossed away on the syzbot web UI, or if the
> bug can be considered closed.
> I hope this might help.

I believe syzbot tries to bisect back to the fix and reports it. Then
either you can ack it (which closes the bug) or the bug will auto-close
after some time if there's no reproducer.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR