Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi Lukasz,

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> This is a continuation of
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>
> >>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series.
> >>>
> >>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>
> >>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]).
> >>>
> >>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory.
> >>>
> >>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices
> >>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core.  It also uses mutex
> >>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking.
> >>>
> >>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs.
> >>
> >> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch
> >> in linux-pm.git.
> >
> > I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC
> > session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've
> > just queued it up for 6.13.
>
> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow.

No, it isn't, please do!