Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests
From: Sasha Levin
Date: Tue Oct 22 2024 - 10:48:31 EST
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 06:52:51AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:48:34PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The script tripped on the very first PR it looked at:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241021171728.274997-1-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx/
And in particular, this commit: afa9b48f327c ("KVM: arm64: Shave a few
bytes from the EL2 idmap code")
(sorry, not trying to pick on anyone/anything, just an example...)
The commit can't be found on lore.kernel.org, it was never in -next, and
yet Linus pulled it promptly without questioning anything.
That was on the list at least, but buried in the replies to a thread
rather than posted separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/86msjc56mi.wl-maz@xxxxxxxxxx
If folks are interested in collaborating around -next analysis and maybe
adding a bot/dashboard/etc, I've pushed my scripts to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/next-analysis.git/
Right now they're enough to generate a histogram showing how many
patches spent N days in -next:
$ git log --format="%H" --no-merges origin/master..next/master | shuf | head -n500 | xargs histo.sh ~/next-analysis/db/
Days in -next:
----------------------------------------
0 |
1 | ████████████████████ (40)
2 | ███████████████████████████████ (62)
3 | █████████████ (27)
4 | █████████████ (27)
5 | ███████████████████ (39)
6 | ██████████████ (28)
7 | ████████ (16)
8 | ██████████████████ (37)
9 | ██████ (12)
10 | █████████████████████ (42)
11 | █████████████████████████ (50)
12 | ██████ (12)
13 | █████ (10)
14+ | █████████████████████████████████████████████████ (98)
As well as find commits that did not appear on lore:
$ git log --format="%H" --no-merges origin/master..next/master | shuf | head -n100 | xargs no-lore.sh ~/next-analysis/db/
c88414f56c37f XArray: Prevent node leaks in xas_alloc()
--
Thanks,
Sasha