Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/22/24 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a continuation of
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices
> >>>>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core.  It also uses mutex
> >>>>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs.
> >>>>
> >>>> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch
> >>>> in linux-pm.git.
> >>>
> >>> I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC
> >>> session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've
> >>> just queued it up for 6.13.
> >>
> >> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow.
> >
> > No, it isn't, please do!
>
> OK, I will do that today.

Thank you!