Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpci: Add FAULT_ALERT handling

[RD Babiera]

Hi Yanik,

> +   /*
> +   * some chips asert fault alert, even if it is masked.
> +   * The FAULT_STATUS is read and
> +   */
> +   if (status & TCPC_ALERT_FAULT)
> +       regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_FAULT_STATUS, &raw);
> +       regmap_write(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_FAULT_STATUS, raw);

Would it make sense to register TCPC_ALERT_FAULT to the alert mask as well?
If TCPC_ALERT_FAULT would be the only alert to trigger an IRQ, will tcpci_irq
still run if it is masked? i.e., can this patch only read/clear the
fault status because
it piggybacks off of another alert?

Best,
RD