Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 05:37:38AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> We could add a report for the above, but:
> 
> 1. Linus consistently pulls patches that haven't seen the light of day.
> 2. Linus explicitly objected to making a linux-next a must have.
> 
> So unless these results would be actually used, what's the point in
> writing all of that?

Yes, without Linus caring we're not going to get our process worked out.
Not sure how a tree that probably won't have much better latency than
linux-next is going to fix that, though.