On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:50:04PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 05:37:38AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
We could add a report for the above, but:
1. Linus consistently pulls patches that haven't seen the light of day.
2. Linus explicitly objected to making a linux-next a must have.
So unless these results would be actually used, what's the point in
writing all of that?
Yes, without Linus caring we're not going to get our process worked out.
Not sure how a tree that probably won't have much better latency than
linux-next is going to fix that, though.
If I recall correctly, one thing Linus asked us to do earlier this year
(ARM Summit) is to CC him on -next failures. I have been failing to do
this, so I will post myself a note or something to remind me.
After all, if Linus doesn't know of a problem with a set of commits,
how does he know not to pull it?