RE: [PATCH v5 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support

[Wei Fang]

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v5: no changes
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
> > index 2445e35a764a..9968a1e9b5ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  /* Copyright 2019 NXP */
> >  #include <linux/fsl/enetc_mdio.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> >  #include "enetc_pf.h"
> >
> >  #define ENETC_MDIO_DEV_ID	0xee01
> > @@ -71,6 +72,8 @@ static int enetc_pci_mdio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >  		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabled ERR050089 workaround\n");
> >  	}
> >
> > +	pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
> > +
> 
> Not an expert on pinctrl by any means.. but is this needed?
> Documentation/driver-api/pin-control.rst says:
> 
> | When a device driver is about to probe the device core will automatically
> | attempt to issue ``pinctrl_get_select_default()`` on these devices.
> | This way driver writers do not need to add any of the boilerplate code
> | of the type found below.
> 
> The documentation is obsolete, because pinctrl_get_select_default()
> doesn't seem to be the current mechanism through which that happens. But
> there is a pinctrl_bind_pins() function in really_probe() which looks
> like it does that job. So.. is this needed?

I think it is no need, I will remove it, thanks.