Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers

[Yue Haibing]

On 2024/10/23 3:17, Jacob Keller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/22/2024 12:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:56:19PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>>> Fixing sparse error in xdp run code by introducing new variable xdp_res
>>> instead of overloading this into the skb pointer as i40e drivers done
>>> in commit 12738ac4754e ("i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c") and
>>> commit ae4393dfd472 ("i40e: fix broken XDP support").
>>>
>>> v3: Fix uninitialized 'xdp_res' in patch 3 and 4 which Reported-by
>>>     kernel test robot
>>> v2: Fix this as i40e drivers done instead of return NULL in xdp run code
>>
>> Hi Yue Haibing, all,
>>
>> I like these changes a lot. But I do wonder if it would
>> be more appropriate to target them at net-next (or iwl-next)
>> rather than net, without Fixes tags. This is because they
>> don't seem to be fixing (user-visible) bugs. Am I missing something?
>>
>> ...
> 
> Yea, these do seem like next candidates.

Should I resend this serial target to iwl-next?
> 
> .