Re: [PATCH 5/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Relocate atomic_threshold to scmi_desc
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Fri Oct 25 2024 - 10:56:09 EST
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:35:57PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:20:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 09:06:02AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanks for having a look.
>
> > > @@ -2959,7 +2952,7 @@ static struct scmi_debug_info *scmi_debugfs_common_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
> > > (char **)&dbg->name);
> > >
> > > debugfs_create_u32("atomic_threshold_us", 0400, top_dentry,
> > > - &info->atomic_threshold);
> > > + (u32 *)&info->desc->atomic_threshold);
> >
> > This cast is unnecessary.
>
> I was indeed wondering why I added that....then I remember something
> about debugfs_create....without that (u32 *):
>
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c: In function ‘scmi_debugfs_common_setup’:
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c:2988:28: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘debugfs_create_u32’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> &info->desc->atomic_threshold);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> since the enclosing struct ->desc is const AND debugfs_create_u32 is NOT
> smart enough to expect a const when the property is R_ONLY...unless I am
> missing something.
>
Ah, I missed the const. Sorry about that.
regards,
dan carpenter