Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_avg_get_on_cpu

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-10-24, 13:08, Beata Michalska wrote:
> That is a fair point but I am not entirely convinced using '0' instead makes
> things any more clearer as this is in no way a valid CPU frequency.
> As long as we document the expected behaviour keeping the interface well
> defined,  both options should be fine I guess.
> 
> @Viresh: what is your opinion on that one ?

Failing to get frequency for the CPU shouldn't be represented by 0,
even if it is confusing for the user.

-- 
viresh