Re: [patch V5 16/26] signal: Replace resched_timer logic
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue Oct 29 2024 - 12:59:17 EST
On Tue, Oct 29 2024 at 17:04, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>> @@ -604,19 +604,19 @@ static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpe
>> */
>> int dequeue_signal(sigset_t *mask, kernel_siginfo_t *info, enum pid_type *type)
>> {
>> + struct sigqueue *timer_sigq = NULL;
>> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
>> - bool resched_timer = false;
>> int signr;
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
>>
>> again:
>> *type = PIDTYPE_PID;
>> - signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, &resched_timer);
>> + signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, &timer_sigq);
>> if (!signr) {
>> *type = PIDTYPE_TGID;
>> signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->signal->shared_pending,
>> - mask, info, &resched_timer);
>> + mask, info, &timer_sigq);
>>
>> if (unlikely(signr == SIGALRM))
>> posixtimer_rearm_itimer(tsk);
>> @@ -642,8 +642,8 @@ int dequeue_signal(sigset_t *mask, kerne
>> current->jobctl |= JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED;
>> }
>>
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS) && unlikely(resched_timer)) {
>> - if (!posixtimer_deliver_signal(info))
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS) && unlikely(timer_sigq)) {
>> + if (!posixtimer_deliver_signal(info, timer_sigq))
>> goto again;
>
> If the signal has been refused, it goes goto again without clearing
> timer_sigq.
That's right. timer_sigq needs to be set to NULL after again:
Good catch!
Thanks,
tglx