Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 10/29/2024 um 1:04 AM schrieb Boqun Feng:
> > 
> > One bit below:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > >       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >       |       RMW ops w/o return value |                                           |
> > >       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -    |                     atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[once]               |
> > > +    |                     atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[noreturn]           |
> > 
> > Not in this patch, but don't you need to update this again to all cap
> > to match your changes in patch #5? ;-)
> > 
> 
> Hmmm, probably that is a good idea.
> I actually had thought about it for some of the other places in the doc that
> mention the tags, and concluded that we'll just use the semantic tags there.
> 
> But in fact, this file is about the syntactic representation in herd, and
> there is no noreturn semantic tag on the W*, so it wouldn't match it even if
> it were correct.
> 
> So I think this needs to be addressed in 5/5.

Thank you for checking!

Please send me either a replacement for 5/5 or a patch for me to fold
into 5/5.

							Thanx, Paul