On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:00:40 +0000,Looks like the UUIDs are System UUIDs (unique). They are not the same as
Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31.10.24 10:46, Abel Vesa wrote:Odd, I didn't get that email.
On 24-10-30 17:02:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:32:24 +0100,The point was to have something unique A codename would be unique.
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add initial support for X1E001DE Snapdragon Devkit for Windows. X1E001DEMy machine has the following information as part of its DMI tables:
is the speed binned variant of X1E80100 that supports turbo boost up to
4.3 Ghz. The initial support includes the following:
-DSPs
-Ethernet (RTL8125BG) over the pcie 5 instance.
-NVme
-Wifi
-USB-C ports
V3:
* Asked around and looked at the firmware, couldn't find a codename so
will keep it as DEVKIT. Will update it if someone from the community
finds something else.
Handle 0x0005, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: Qualcomm
Product Name: Snapdragon-Devkit
Version: 2.1
Serial Number: 5
UUID: 63b5fc8b-9c50-89aa-fd0f-3fcef93dc291
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
SKU Number: 6
Family: SCP_HAMOA
So I guess that Snapdragon-Devkit is another possible name. But given
that it is a bit of a mouthful, devkit, Devkit, or any other variation
on the case would work for me.
Naming it Snapdragon-Devkit (or just devkit) will be confusing since
there was already a 2023 devkit (from Microsoft) with the Snapdragon
8cx Gen 3, and probably the next compute platform will also have a devkit
as well. So probably "X Elite devkit" could be the right option..
My point was the the HW already comes with a full description as part
of the existing tables. If you really want something that is truly
unique to that platform and that can be used by a tool (be it
firmware, kernel or userspace) to understand what it is running on,
then you cannot have *less* information.
At the very least, you would need Manufacturer, Product Name, Version
and Family.
But does it really matter? I don't think it is *that* crucial. At the
end of the day, this is only used to pick the correct DT out of a set
for a given SoC, or worse case a family of SoCs that are closely
related.
As for The Windows Dev Kit 2023, dmidecode says this:Are those actually per platform? or per unit? On my box, the serial
Handle 0x0009, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
Product Name: Windows Dev Kit 2023
Version: 124I:00097T:000M:0200000B:07
Serial Number: 0F01C4F22373F6
UUID: e4a4662c-8367-75d0-a54f-1d04bd404860
Wake-up Type: Unknown
SKU Number: 2043
Family: Surface
That's also really a mouthful. In my patchset for it there were some
name / path changes, microsoft/blackrock it is now. Would be cool to
have short and unique names. In the end, whatever works and is unique.
Like those UUIDs?
number is probably a dud. What does the UUID reports on your X1E box?
Thanks,
M.