Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] dt-bindings: mips: cpu: Add property for broken HCI information
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer
Date: Thu Oct 31 2024 - 10:44:24 EST
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 09:13:57AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Jiaxun,
>
> > 在2024年10月29日十月 下午4:11,Jiaxun Yang写道:
> >> 在2024年10月29日十月 下午12:21,Aleksandar Rikalo写道:
> >> [...]
> >>>
> >>>> Is this property applicable for all MIPS vendors? There is no vendor
> >>>> prefix here, so this is generic for this architecture, right?
> >>
> >> I'd say the best vendor prefix is mti in this case.
> >>
> >> CM3 IP block is supplied by MIPS Technology, it is not a part of MIPS
> >> architecture spec.
> >
> > I just tried to revise this problem and I think a better approach would
> > be picking my CM binding [1] patch and add this as a property to CM binding.
> >
> > You don't need to pick rest of that series, this binding alone is sufficient,
> > and it's already being reviewed.
> >
> > Thanks
> > [1]:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612-cm_probe-v2-5-a5b55440563c@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> I had a look at your series and it seems that all the issues raised were
> solved, so why wasn't it merged?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2xkut5pyzk4b4ugl4ku72y4rfqrfsoxj4aww2jwlgkc3lmd464@zwf773fr7fpq/
so it's still unclear to me, whether there is something to fix or not.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]