Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] rust: macros: add macro to easily run KUnit tests

[Boqun Feng]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:12:06PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 10:38 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > but this lint doesn't make sense to me, I would say we just drop this
> > lint?
> 
> I am not sure if it is intended to fire there (i.e. to resolve
> constants), but seems OK since it is not something one would want
> normally to write except in exceptional cases.
> 

Hmm.. so I think clippy won't warn for a normal Rust #[test] function:

	https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7811

but since in this patch #[test] is handled by us instead of by "rustc
--test" (I assume this is how Rust std handle #[cfg(test)] and
#[test]?), clippy doesn't know.

> So we could drop it globally, but if it is just this case that we
> expect, then I think it is better to just `#[expect(...)]` it (or
> perhaps use a different example) and then, if we see in the future
> that we have quite a few "trivial" comparisons like this, then we can
> drop it globally.
> 

It seems to me that clippy agrees not triggering this in test code at
least.

Regards,
Boqun

> Cheers,
> Miguel