Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Le Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 10:44:35AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 00:46, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > And what about the other callers of flush_sigqueue_mask()? Such as SIGCONT
> > removed when SIGSTOP arrives? And the reverse as well? This moves the pending
> > timers signals to the ignore list until the signal is unignored, but in that
> > case SIGCONT is not ignored? Or perhaps SIGCONT and SIGSTOP can't be set for
> > posix timers?
> 
> You can set SIGSTOP/CONT on a posix timer. Whether that makes sense or
> not is a different question :)
> 
> Even on current mainline the behaviour is pretty much unspecified. Some
> combinations "work", some not. I just tried out of morbid curiousity. :)

I see.

So probably we shouldn't care too much, right?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> 
>