On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 06:46:19PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:48:34PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:This looks super nice. Sometimes I need to answer how long a
>On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:54:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> For example, for a given PR, the bot can report:
>>
>> - Were the patches CCed to a mailing list?
>> - A histogram of how long the patches were in next (to show bake times)
>> - Are any patches associated with test failures? (0day and many other
>> CIs are already running tests against -next; parse those reports)
>>
>> We could have a real pre-submit checker! :)
>
>That would be very useful. Items 1 and 2 should be trivial, 3 would
>require a bit of work but would still be very useful.
If you've been following so far, there is a bot that is capable of doing
most of the above
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/next-analysis.git/).
Here's a histogram that describes v6.12-rc4..v6.12-rc5 as far as how
long commits spent in -next:
Days in linux-next:
----------------------------------------
0 | +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ (89)
<1 | +++++++++++ (21)
1 | +++++++++++ (21)
2 | +++++++++++++++++++++++++ (45)
3 | ++++++++++++++ (25)
4 | +++++ (10)
5 |
6 | + (2)
7 |
8 | + (3)
9 | ++ (4)
10 |
11 | +++ (6)
12 |
13 |
14+| ++++++++ (15)
commit/series has been in next to either take it out of the PR or to at
least have a comment to Linus.
I see that I can use the script like `histo.sh /PATH/TO/DB COMMIT-ID`,
which is exactly what I would expect.
Is the idea to run the scripts from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/next-analysis.git
or to populate ones own DB in linux-next and then run histo?