Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] x86/sev: Map only the RMP table entries instead of the full RMP range

[Tom Lendacky]

On 11/4/24 00:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:32:40PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> @@ -224,7 +246,14 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
>>  	if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
>>  		goto skip_enable;
>>  
>> -	memset(rmptable_start, 0, probed_rmp_size);
>> +	/* Zero out the RMP bookkeeping area */
>> +	if (!init_rmptable_bookkeeping()) {
> 
> So let's call it what it is then:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index 5871c924c0b2..8145a7b14fa2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void __init snp_fixup_e820_tables(void)
>  	__snp_fixup_e820_tables(probed_rmp_base + probed_rmp_size);
>  }
>  
> -static bool __init init_rmptable_bookkeeping(void)
> +static bool __init clear_rmptable_bookkeeping(void)

Sure.

Thanks,
Tom

>  {
>  	void *bk;
>  
> @@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
>  	if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
>  		goto skip_enable;
>  
> -	/* Zero out the RMP bookkeeping area */
> -	if (!init_rmptable_bookkeeping()) {
> +	if (!clear_rmptable_bookkeeping()) {
>  		memunmap(rmptable_start);
>  		goto nosnp;
>  	}
> 
>