Re: [PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic

[Alexey Gladkov]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:44:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/04, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > But it seems that the change in inc_rlimit_get_ucounts() can be
> > > a bit simpler and more readable, see below.
> >
> > Eric suggested the same approach earlier in this thread.
> 
> Ah, good, I didn't know ;)
> 
> > I personally
> > don't have a strong preference here or actually I slightly prefer my
> > own version because this comparison to LONG_MAX looks confusing to me.
> > But if you have a strong preference, I'm happy to send out v2. Please,
> > let me know.
> 
> Well, I won't insist.
> 
> To me the change proposed by Eric and me looks much more readable, but
> of course this is subjective.
> 
> But you know, you can safely ignore me. Alexey and Eric understand this
> code much better, so I leave this to you/Alexey/Eric.

Personally, I like Oleg's patch more.

-- 
Rgrds, legion