Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable SND_SOC_SPDIF

[Stefan Wahren]

Am 05.11.24 um 14:58 schrieb Elinor Montmasson:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Monday, 4 November, 2024 17:20:38, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > >
> > > Am 04.11.24 um 09:05 schrieb Stefan Eichenberger:
> > > > Hi Stefan,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > Hi Stefan,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 02.11.24 um 15:36 schrieb Stefan Eichenberger:
> > > > > > Hi Shawn,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 03:21:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 01:21:12PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> > > > > > > > From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Enable SND_SOC_SPDIF in imx_v6_v7_defconfig to support SPDIF audio. This
> > > > > > > > change will fix commit d469b771afe1 ("ARM: dts: imx6: update spdif sound
> > > > > > > > card node properties") which moves away from the old "spdif-controller"
> > > > > > > > property to the new "audio-codec" property.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Fixes: d469b771afe1 ("ARM: dts: imx6: update spdif sound card node properties")
> > > > > > > It doesn't look a fix to me.
> > > > > > I agree somehow, it was just that before the referenced commit our test
> > > > > > succeeds with the imx_v6_v7_defconfig and after that we get the
> > > > > > following error:
> > > > > > [   24.165534] platform sound-spdif: deferred probe pending: fsl-asoc-card:
> > > > > > snd_soc_register_card failed
> > > > > this error should have been in the commit message including the
> > > > > information which platform/board is affected.
> > > > Okay, I will add this information to the next version. We see this error
> > > > on an Apalis iMX6 which has in my variant an NXP i.MX6Q SoC.
> > > >
> > > > > > So maybe it is not a fix in the sense of a bug, but it fixes the error
> > > > > > message. However, I'm also fine with removing the Fixes tag.
> > > > > But this patch doesn't look like the real approach.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please clarify the impact of the regression?
> > > > So the problem is that before commit d469b771afe1 ("ARM: dts: imx6:
> > > > update spdif sound card node properties") the audio driver was
> > > > using an implementation of linux,spdif-dit and linux,spdif-dir which was
> > > > directly inside the fsl,imx-audio-spdif compatible driver. Now with the
> > > > referenced commit the idea is to use the more generic linux,spdif-dir
> > > > and linux,spdif-dit compatible drivers. That's why this driver must be
> > > > enabled in the kernel configuration.
> > > >
> > > > > Is it just this error message and audio works fine or is audio also broken?
> > > > It is not just the error message, audio is not working because the
> > > > driver deferes and because it is not enabled it will never succeed to
> > > > load. I don't know if this is called a regression, because the driver is
> > > > there it is just not enabled in the imx6_v7_defconfig. I thought because
> > > > a lot of the i.MX6 based board use the generic driver, it makes sense to
> > > > enable it in the imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
> > > okay, thanks for the clarification. From my understanding
> > > imx6_v7_defconfig is just an example config for testing. All possible
> > > users of these boards might have their own configs and stumble across
> > > the same issue. So I thought it would be better to add the dependency in
> > > the Kconfig of the FSL audio driver.
> > >
> > > I'm not that audio driver expert and don't know how the dependency
> > > handling between the FSL audio driver and the required codecs like
> > > SND_SOC_SPDIF. So it's possible that I'm completely wrong here and your
> > > approach is the best we can do.
> > That might be a good point. I don't know how this is usually handled.
> > @Shawn and @Elinor, do you think this could be an approach to make
> > SND_SOC_FSL_ASOC_CARD select SND_SOC_SPDIF? It already seems to do this
> > for SND_SOC_WM8994 and SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF.
> SND_SOC_FSL_ASOC_CARD will compile the machine driver fsl-asoc-card,
> SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF the CPU DAI driver fsl_spdif for the SPDIF
> and SND_SOC_SPDIF the codec drivers spdif-rx and spdif-tx.
>
> In my commit series I made SND_SOC_FSL_ASOC_CARD select SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF
> because the old machine driver previously compiled with SND_SOC_IMX_SPDIF
> selected SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF.
> But because fsl-asoc-card is a generic driver, it could be used on a system
> that doesn't have an SPDIF device, and therefore should not require
> SND_SOC_SPDIF nor SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF.
> So maybe it is not a good idea to automatically select SND_SOC_FSL_SPDIF or SND_SOC_SPDIF.
>
> On the other hand, if every imx6 or imx7 boards have an SPDIF device, then
> I suppose SND_SOC_SPDIF can be put in imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
Okay, I'm fine with the original approach.
> Regards,
> Elinor