Re: [PATCH 5/6] of: Use the standards compliant default address cells value for x86

[Herve Codina]

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:07:59 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...
> 
> I prefer the default to just be wrong. My intention is to get rid of
> the defaults (at least for all FDT, not OF) and walking up parent
> nodes. My first step was to add warnings[1] and see who complained.
> 
> The base tree needs to be populated with #address-cells/#size-cells.
> I'd be fine if we say those are always 2 to keep it simple.
> 

Right in that case, I could add the #address-cells/#size-cells in the empty
node (empty_node.dts) used on all architecture when ACPI is enabled or the
bootloader doesn't provide a fdt.

Best regards,
Hervé