Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] Enable CET Virtualization

[Yang, Weijiang]

On 11/6/2024 2:25 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 17:31 +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
> > > A decent number of comments, but almost all of them are quite minor.  The
> > > big
> > > open is how to handle save/restore of SSP from userspace.
> > >
> > > Instead of spinning a full v10, maybe send an RFC for KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG
> > > idea?
> > OK, I'll send an RFC patch after relevant discussion is settled.
> >
> > > That will make it easier to review, and if you delay v11 a bit, I should be
> > > able
> > > to get various series applied that have minor conflicts/dependencies, e.g.
> > > the
> > > MSR access and the kvm_host series.
> > I can wait until the series landed in x86-kvm tree.
> > Appreciated for your review and comments!
> It looks like this series is very close. Since this v10, there was some
> discussion on the FPU part that seemed settled:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1c2fd06e-2e97-4724-80ab-8695aa4334e7@xxxxxxxxx/

Hi, Rick,
I have an internal branch to hold a v11 candidate for this series, which resolved Sean's comments
for this v10, waiting for someone to take over and continue the upstream work.

> Then there was also some discussion on the synthetic MSR solution, which seemed
> prescriptive enough:
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240509075423.156858-1-weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Weijiang, had you started a v2 on the synthetic MSR series? Where did you get to
> on incorporating the other small v10 feedback?

Yes, Sean's review feedback for v1 is also included in my above v11 candidate.