On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 17:31 +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
It looks like this series is very close. Since this v10, there was someA decent number of comments, but almost all of them are quite minor. TheOK, I'll send an RFC patch after relevant discussion is settled.
big
open is how to handle save/restore of SSP from userspace.
Instead of spinning a full v10, maybe send an RFC for KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG
idea?
That will make it easier to review, and if you delay v11 a bit, I should beI can wait until the series landed in x86-kvm tree.
able
to get various series applied that have minor conflicts/dependencies, e.g.
the
MSR access and the kvm_host series.
Appreciated for your review and comments!
discussion on the FPU part that seemed settled:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1c2fd06e-2e97-4724-80ab-8695aa4334e7@xxxxxxxxx/
Then there was also some discussion on the synthetic MSR solution, which seemed
prescriptive enough:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240509075423.156858-1-weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx/
Weijiang, had you started a v2 on the synthetic MSR series? Where did you get to
on incorporating the other small v10 feedback?