Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags

[Jonas Oberhauser]

Am 11/5/2024 um 9:21 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 07:34:45AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > Am 10/30/2024 um 12:41 AM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > > > > Not all tags that are always there syntactically also provide semantic
> > > > > > membership in the corresponding set. For example, an 'acquire tag on a
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe:
> > > > >
> > > > > Not all annotated accesses provide the same semantic as their syntactic
> > > > > tags...
> > > > >
> > > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Jonas, are you OK with this change?  If so, I can apply it on my next
> > > > rebase.
> > >
> > > I'm ok with an extra s after semantics and a minor rephrase:
> > >
> > > Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic
> > > tags would imply
> > >
> > > What do you think @Boqun ?
> >
> > Yes, of course! This looks good to me.
>
> Please see below for what I currently have.  If there are no objections
> in a day or so, I will set up these five commits for the upcoming v6.13
> merge window.
>
> The additional bit pointed out by Boqun [1] can be addressed by a
> separate commit.
>
> 							Thanx, Paul
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZyAmlh5GDBsqY0sZ@Boquns-Mac-mini.local/

I'm confused, did I forget to add the fix to the capitalization issue 
discovered by Boqun to the fixed commit? I vividly remember typing git 
commit add ...


    jonas