Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Adjust SRSO mitigation to new features

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I do subscribe to kvm@, but it's a mailing list, not at alias like x86@.  AFAIK,
> x86@ is unique in that regard.  In other words, I don't see a need to document
> the kvm@ behavior, because that's the behavior for every L: entry in MAINTAINERS
> except the few "L:	x86@xxxxxxxxxx" cases.

I have had maintainers in the past not like to be CCed directly as long as the
corresponding mailing list is CCed. You guys want to be CCed. I will try to
remember that. We have different trees, with different requirements, wishes,
idiosyncrasies and so on. And you know that very well.

So document it or not - your call.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette