Re: [PATCH v4 03/22] perf jevents: Add smi metric group for Intel models

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Wed Nov 06 2024 - 12:42:51 EST


On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:32 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024-09-26 1:50 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Allow duplicated metric to be dropped from json files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py b/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
> > index f875eb844c78..f34b4230a4ee 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
> > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > from metric import (d_ratio, has_event, max, Event, JsonEncodeMetric,
> > JsonEncodeMetricGroupDescriptions, LoadEvents, Metric,
> > - MetricGroup, Select)
> > + MetricGroup, MetricRef, Select)
> > import argparse
> > import json
> > import math
> > @@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ def Rapl() -> MetricGroup:
> > description="Running Average Power Limit (RAPL) power consumption estimates")
> >
> >
> > +def Smi() -> MetricGroup:
> > + aperf = Event('msr/aperf/')
> > + cycles = Event('cycles')
> > + smi_num = Event('msr/smi/')
> > + smi_cycles = Select(Select((aperf - cycles) / aperf, smi_num > 0, 0),
> > + has_event(aperf),
> > + 0)
> > + return MetricGroup('smi', [
> > + Metric('smi_num', 'Number of SMI interrupts.',
> > + Select(smi_num, has_event(smi_num), 0), 'SMI#'),
> > + # Note, the smi_cycles "Event" is really a reference to the metric.
> > + Metric('smi_cycles',
> > + 'Percentage of cycles spent in System Management Interrupts. '
> > + 'Requires /sys/devices/cpu/freeze_on_smi to be 1.',
>
> It seems not work for hybrid?

Thanks. The code is a migration of existing metrics that exist for hybrid:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json?h=perf-tools-next#n74
I still lack an easy way to test on hybrid, but I think fixing that
case can be follow on work.

Thanks,
Ian