[PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
From: Juergen Gross
Date: Fri Nov 08 2024 - 11:13:51 EST
Using a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY is not nice, fix that.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8e853a5fc867..d4a9f845b373 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6157,7 +6157,7 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
vcpu->stat.pf_spurious++;
if (r != RET_PF_EMULATE)
- return 1;
+ return RET_PF_RETRY;
emulate:
return x86_emulate_instruction(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, emulation_type, insn,
--
2.43.0