Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] scftorture: Avoid kfree from IRQ context.

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Nov 08 2024 - 13:45:22 EST

Next message: Mina Almasry: "Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: clarify SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED behavior in documentation"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] scftorture: Avoid kfree from IRQ context."
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] scftorture: Avoid kfree from IRQ context."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2024-11-08 10:33:29 [-0800], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Sebastian, I am guessing that the Kconfig change exposing the bugs fixed
> by your series is headed to mainline for the upcoming merge window?

Yes. It is in tip/locking/core.

> If so, I should of course push these in as well.

That would be nice ;)

> Thanx, Paul

Sebastian

Next message: Mina Almasry: "Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: clarify SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED behavior in documentation"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] scftorture: Avoid kfree from IRQ context."
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] scftorture: Avoid kfree from IRQ context."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]