On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/10/2024 12:20, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
Add DT support for QUPv3 Serial Engines.
Co-developed-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Build Dependencies:
Base:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20240926-add_initial_support_for_qcs615-v3-5-e37617e91c62@xxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20240926-add_initial_support_for_qcs615-v3-6-e37617e91c62@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Clock: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20240920-qcs615-clock-driver-v2-3-2f6de44eb2aa@xxxxxxxxxxx/
ICC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20240924143958.25-2-quic_rlaggysh@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Apps SMMU: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241011063112.19087-1-quic_qqzhou@xxxxxxxxxxx/
v1 -> v2:
- Add opp-shared property.
- Use QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS flag in interconnect property.
v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241011103346.22925-1-quic_vdadhani@xxxxxxxxxxx/
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 642 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 638 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
index 865ead601f85..1d1cdf6f9a74 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-gcc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/dma/qcom-gpi.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs615-rpmh.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
@@ -17,6 +18,21 @@
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
+ aliases {
+ i2c1 = &i2c1;
+ i2c2 = &i2c2;
+ i2c3 = &i2c3;
+ i2c4 = &i2c4;
+ i2c5 = &i2c5;
+ i2c6 = &i2c6;
+ i2c7 = &i2c7;
+ spi2 = &spi2;
+ spi4 = &spi4;
+ spi6 = &spi6;
+ spi7 = &spi7;
+ serial0 = &uart0;
Comments from v1 apply.
[...]
@@ -392,6 +428,24 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
};
+ gpi_dma0: qcom,gpi-dma@800000 {
Nope. Don't post downstream code.
I'd say, as this has repeated the second time, please get the patches
reviewed internally, before sending them for the third time.