Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i3c: dw: Add support for AMDI0015 ACPI ID

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 11/12/2024 15:18, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On 11/12/24 10:48 AM, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>>> Am I right this and patch 5/5 can be independent from rest of the
>>> series?
>>
>> Right. 1/5 and 5/5 can be grouped. But rest of the other patches are
>> equally important because they drive the usecase.
>>
>>>
>>> To me it looks these two patches enable bus communication and thus be
>>> useful without rest of the series while latter need more discussion
>>> (I'll have some notes coming) and Cc'ing linux-acpi.
>>
>> I have Cc'ed linux-acpi in this revision. Do you have any feedback for
>> patches 2-4 ?
>>
> Yes, I'm reviewing them and only the patch 2/5 was Cc'ed to linux-acpi.
> 
> Patchset split would serve better in my opinion enabling basic
> communication and have an other set concentrating more complex
> scenario we were try to get input from ACPI folks.

Ok. I can copy the linux-apci for patches from 2-4 after your feedback
on the current series.

Can atleast patches 1/5 and 5/5 be independently applied for -next so
they we don't miss out this cycle?

Thanks,
Shyam