On Wed 13-11-24 08:45:06, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 12:27 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:Now that I'm looking at it I'm not sure fanotify is a great fit for this
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:39:21PM GMT, Christian Brauner wrote:New fanotify events for mount table changes, perhaps?
Next on the wish list is a notification (a file descriptor that can be
used in epoll) that returns a 64-bit ID when there is a change in the
mount node. This will enable us to enhance systemd so that it does not
have to read the entire mount table after every change.
usecase. A lot of fanotify functionality does not really work for virtual
filesystems such as proc and hence we generally try to discourage use of
fanotify for them. So just supporting one type of event (like FAN_MODIFY)
on one file inside proc looks as rather inconsistent interface. But I
vaguely remember we were discussing some kind of mount event, weren't we?
Or was that for something else?