Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h

[David Hildenbrand]

On 15.11.24 10:44, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 10/25/24 at 05:11pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > These defines are not related to /proc/kcore, move them to crash_dump.h
> > instead. While at it, rename "struct vmcore" to "struct
> > vmcore_mem_node", which is a more fitting name.
>
> Agree it's inappropriate to put the defintions in kcore.h. However for
> 'struct vmcore', it's only used in fs/proc/vmcore.c from my code
> serching, do you think if we can put it in fs/proc/vmcore.c directly?
> And 'struct vmcoredd_node' too.

See the next patches and how virtio-mem will make use of the feactored 
out functions. Not putting them as inline functions into a header will 
require exporting symbols just do add a vmcore memory node to the list, 
which I want to avoid -- overkill for these simple helpers.

> And about the renaming, with my understanding each instance of struct
> vmcore represents one memory region, isn't it a little confusing to be
> called vmcore_mem_node? I understand you probablly want to unify the
> vmcore and vmcoredd's naming. I have to admit I don't know vmcoredd well
> and its naming, while most of people have been knowing vmcore representing
> memory region very well.

I chose "vmcore_mem_node" because it is a memory range stored in a list. 
Note the symmetry with "vmcoredd_node"

If there are strong feelings I can use a different name, but 
"vmcore_mem_node" really describes what it actually is. Especially now 
that we have different vmcore nodes.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb