Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Usable clocks on Mobileye EyeQ5 & EyeQ6H

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> 
> On Wed Nov 6, 2024 at 5:03 PM CET, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > Now that clk-eyeq is in the clk-next tree, we can add the small(-ish)
> > details required to make the platform work fully. The work is mostly
> > about updating devicetrees to rely on the system-controller nodes as
> > clock providers.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >  - clk:
> >    [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: set `#clock-cells = <1>` for all compatibles
> >    [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: clock: eyeq: add more Mobileye EyeQ5/EyeQ6H clocks
> >    [PATCH v2 03/10] clk: fixed-factor: add clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index() function
> >    [PATCH v2 04/10] clk: eyeq: require clock index with phandle in all cases
> >    [PATCH v2 05/10] clk: eyeq: add fixed factor clocks infrastructure
> >    [PATCH v2 06/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ5 fixed factor clocks
> >    [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H central fixed factor clocks
> >    [PATCH v2 08/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H west fixed factor clocks
> >
> >  - MIPS:
> >    [PATCH v2 09/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: use OLB as provider for fixed factor clocks
> >    [PATCH v2 10/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq6h: add OLB nodes OLB and remove fixed clocks
> 
> Do you think we can make those two patches go in before the next merge
> window? Stephen just accepted the above patches. This makes both MIPS
> platforms usable on upstream kernels!

I've applied, but not pushed, because this

Error: /local/tbogendoerfer/korg/linux/arch/mips/boot/dts/mobileye/eyeq5.dtsi:20.19-20 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input treeo

My tree misses the new CLK defines.

I haven't decided whether I'll ignore that and push it now or put them
into a second request vor 6.13.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]