On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 02:20:26AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:Hello Ojaswin,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:Hi Ritesh,
One of the paths quota writeback is called from is:Not just that, sync_filesystem can also be called from other places and
freeze_super()
sync_filesystem()
ext4_sync_fs()
dquot_writeback_dquots()
Since we currently don't always flush the quota_release_work queue in
this path, we can end up with the following race:
1. dquot are added to releasing_dquots list during regular operations.
2. FS freeze starts, however, this does not flush the quota_release_work queue.
3. Freeze completes.
4. Kernel eventually tries to flush the workqueue while FS is frozen which
hits a WARN_ON since transaction gets started during frozen state:
ext4_journal_check_start+0x28/0x110 [ext4] (unreliable)
__ext4_journal_start_sb+0x64/0x1c0 [ext4]
ext4_release_dquot+0x90/0x1d0 [ext4]
quota_release_workfn+0x43c/0x4d0
Which is the following line:
WARN_ON(sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE);
Which ultimately results in generic/390 failing due to dmesg
noise. This was detected on powerpc machine 15 cores.
To avoid this, make sure to flush the workqueue during
dquot_writeback_dquots() so we dont have any pending workitems after
freeze.
quota_release_workfn() could write out and and release the dquot
structures if such are found during processing of releasing_dquots list.
IIUC, this was earlier done in the same dqput() context but had races
with dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(). Hence the final dqput() will now add the
dquot structures to releasing_dquots list and will schedule a delayed
workfn which will process the releasing_dquots list.
Ohh right, thanks for the context. I see this was done here:
dabc8b207566 quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu
should provide
Which went in v6.5. Let me cc Baokun as well.
And so after the final dqput and before the release_workfn getsRight, I'll add that in the next revision. I believe it would be:
scheduled, if dquot gets marked as dirty or dquot_transfer gets called -
then I am suspecting that it could lead to a dirty or an active dquot.
Hence, flushing the delayed quota_release_work at the end of
dquot_writeback_dquots() looks like the right thing to do IMO.
But I can give another look as this part of the code is not that well
known to me.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Maybe a fixes tag as well?
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Fixes: dabc8b207566 ("quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide")
Regards,
ojaswin
fs/quota/dquot.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
index 3dd8d6f27725..2782cfc8c302 100644
--- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
+++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
@@ -729,6 +729,8 @@ int dquot_writeback_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type)
sb->dq_op->write_info(sb, cnt);
dqstats_inc(DQST_SYNCS);
+ flush_delayed_work("a_release_work);
+
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dquot_writeback_dquots);
--
2.43.5