Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] objtool: Generic annotation infrastructure

From: Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Tue Nov 19 2024 - 20:04:41 EST


On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:31:25PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:38:28AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > +#define ASM_ANNOTATE(x) \
> > > > + "911:\n\t" \
> > > > + ".pushsection .discard.annotate,\"M\",@progbits,8\n\t" \
> > > > + ".long 911b - .\n\t" \
> > > > + ".long " __stringify(x) "\n\t" \
> > > > + ".popsection\n\t"
> > >
> > > Why mergeable and progbits?
> >
> > In order to get sh_entsize ?
>
> Is that a guess? If so, it's not very convincing as I don't see what
> entsize would have to do with it.

Oh, nevermind... I see it's a gas syntax issue.

--
Josh