Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add second power-domain to CAMCC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 01:10:32PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The x1e80100 has two power-domains for the CAMCC not one.
> 
> Capture this as:
> minItems:1
> maxItems:2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
> index 0766f66c7dc4f6b81afa01f156c490f4f742fcee..afb7e37118b691658fc5cc71e97b110dcee7f22a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml
> @@ -39,9 +39,10 @@ properties:
>        - description: Sleep clock source
>  
>    power-domains:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
>      description:
> -      A phandle and PM domain specifier for the MMCX power domain.
> +      A phandle and PM domain specifier for the MMCX or MCX power domains.
>  

Instead list the items with description and minItems
minItems: 1
items:
  - description:
  - description:

also add in allOf section if:then: constraining it for all variants
(maxItems: 1 and minItems: 2).

Optionally X1E could be moved to a new binding. I think this would be
better, but I do not insist.

Best regards,
Krzysztof