RE: [PATCH v5 3/9] drm: bridge: inno-hdmi: add inno bridge driver.

[Keith Zhao]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2024年11月20日 22:56
> To: Keith Zhao <keith.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx; neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx; rfoss@xxxxxxxxxx;
> Laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx;
> maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mripard@xxxxxxxxxx;
> tzimmermann@xxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx; simona@xxxxxxxx;
> robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> hjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; heiko@xxxxxxxxx; andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; William Qiu
> <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> kernel@xxxxxxxx; paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Changhuang Liang
> <changhuang.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] drm: bridge: inno-hdmi: add inno bridge driver.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 02:18:42PM +0800, keith zhao wrote:
> > +struct platform_driver inno_hdmi_driver = {
> > +	.probe  = inno_hdmi_rockchip_probe,
> > +	.remove_new = inno_hdmi_rockchip_remove,
> 
> Please use .remove instead of .remove_new.
> 
Thank you for the clarification regarding .remove_new. 
I understand that it's a relic and that new drivers should implement .remove().

I have a question. One of the changes in this patch is to rename some function interfaces. 
The original code is like this. 

struct platform_driver inno_hdmi_driver = {
	.probe  = inno_hdmi_probe,
	.remove_new = inno_hdmi_remove,
	.driver = {
		.name = "innohdmi-rockchip",
		.of_match_table = inno_hdmi_dt_ids,
	},
};

Rename inno_hdmi_probe and inno_hdmi_remove
struct platform_driver inno_hdmi_driver = {
	.probe  = inno_hdmi_rockchip_probe,
	.remove_new = inno_hdmi_rockchip_remove,
	.driver = {
		.name = "innohdmi-rockchip",
		.of_match_table = inno_hdmi_dt_ids,
	},
};
Based on the principle of maintaining consistency, 
does it(remove_new) need to be changed?

Thanks

> Best regards
> Uwe