Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 21/11/2024 21:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Is it for the MMCX or for MXC domain? If my memory doesn't play tricks
> on me (it can) I think that on sm8250 I had to keep MMCX up to access
> registers. But it also well might be that I didn't run the fine-grained
> test and the MMCX was really required to power up the PLLs rather than
> registers.

I see MXC is also used by the cdsp.

I'll have a poke to see if I can ensure both PDs are off and see what 
happens to reg access.

Perhaps my first pass test didn't cover it.

---
bod